The Postponement of Simultaneous Village Head Elections in Majene Regency:

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the legal and governance implications of postponing the simultaneous Village Head Elections in Majene Regency, West Sulawesi, in 2023. The central legal issue concerns whether the postponement was consistent with the principles of legality, accountability, and local democratic governance. Previous studies have discussed the postponement of Village Head Elections in other regions, but limited attention has been given to the relationship between regulatory inconsistency, regent authority, and democratic legitimacy at the village level. This study offers novelty by analyzing the Majene case through an integrated philosophical, sociological, and juridical perspective.

Research Design and Methodology: Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected through regulatory document analysis, interviews with key stakeholders, field observation, and supporting documentation.

Findings and Discussion: The findings show that the postponement created legal uncertainty, weakened the continuity of democratic leadership, and shifted village accountability from electoral legitimacy to bureaucratic appointment. The use of an improper legal instrument and the inconsistent replacement of local regulations also weakened public trust in regional governance.

Implications: This study contributes to the development of local government law by emphasizing that postponing Village Head Elections must be based on a clear legal foundation, transparent justification, accountable procedures, and protection of villagers’ voting rights.