The Dynamics of Remote Work Culture: How Psychological Well-Being and Digital Collaboration Tools Shape Employee Productivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70184/kc639716Keywords:
remote work, psychological well-being, employee productivity, digital collaboration tools, hybrid work culture, digital communicationAbstract
This study explores how psychological well-being and digital collaboration tools interact to influence employee productivity within remote work environments. As remote and hybrid work models become increasingly normalized, organizations must understand the human–technology dynamics that drive sustainable performance. Using a quantitative approach with data from 462 remote employees across technology, education, and service sectors, this research applies structural equation modeling to examine direct and mediated relationships among work stress, digital overload, collaboration-tool usability, communication quality, and productivity outcomes. Findings reveal that psychological well-being significantly predicts productivity, with work engagement acting as a partial mediator. Digital collaboration tools also demonstrate a strong positive effect on productivity, particularly when usability, responsiveness, and synchronization are high. Furthermore, effective digital collaboration moderates the negative effects of stress and communication breakdowns. The study highlights the need for organizations to strategically manage digital ecosystems while supporting employee mental health to maximize performance in remote contexts.
Downloads
References
Bai, X., & Liu, H. (2021). Digital collaboration platforms and employee productivity: An empirical study in remote working environments. Journal of Business Research, 134, 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.014
Bentley, T., Teo, S., McLeod, L., Tan, F., Bosua, R., & Gloet, M. (2020). The role of organizational support in teleworker well-being: A socio-technical systems approach. Applied Ergonomics, 87, 103129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103129
Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju032
Brougham, D., Haar, J., & Parker, S. (2021). The future of work: Technology adoption and employee well-being in remote work contexts. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(4), 920–935. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12340
Carnevale, J. B., & Hatak, I. (2020). Employee adjustment and well-being in the era of COVID-19: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Business Research, 116, 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.037
Cho, E. (2020). Examining boundaries to understand teleworkers’ job stressors and psychological well-being. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35(5), 697–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-019-09645-3
Collins, A. M., Hislop, D., Cartwright, S., & Axtell, C. (2016). Remote working, stress, and well-being. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12072
Darvishmotevali, M., & Ali, F. (2020). Job insecurity, subjective well-being and employee performance: The moderating role of psychological capital. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 87, 102462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102462
Feng, Y., & Savani, K. (2020). Covid-19 created a gender gap in perceived work productivity and job satisfaction. Psychological Science, 31(10), 1193–1201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620964587
Ford, D., Storey, M. A., Zimmermann, T., Bird, C., & Maddila, C. (2021). A tale of two cities: Software developers working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 31(2), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3487569
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
Golden, T. D., & Gajendran, R. (2019). Unpacking the role of integration in telework effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 62(4), 1315–1337. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0596
Kim, S., Park, S., & Lee, J. (2022). Digital collaboration systems and remote work productivity: Examining worker-tool fit. Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107242
Kniffin, K. M., et al. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716
Lal, B., & Dwivedi, Y. (2020). Remote working, employee productivity, and digital transformation: Lessons from COVID-19. Information Systems Frontiers, 24, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10029-8
Messenger, J. C., & Gschwind, L. (2016). Three generations of telework: New ICTs and the (r)evolution of remote work. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31(3), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12073
Ojala, S., Pyöriä, P., & Nätti, J. (2014). The complexity of knowledge work in changing workplaces. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 27(3), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-12-2012-0181
Oakman, J., et al. (2020). Working from home during COVID-19: Risks and benefits for employee health. Safety Science, 134, 105106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105106
Putri, R. N., & Amran, A. (2021). Employees’ work-life balance and productivity during work-from-home conditions. International Journal of Management, 12(3), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJM.12.3.2021.005
Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12290
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Michael Mncedisi Willie, Aarav R. Menon (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
