Leadership Effectiveness, Competency Development, and Educational Staff Performance:
Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction and Moderating Role of Digital Literacy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.70184/613jjv15
educational staff performance;, digital literacy; , job satisfaction; , competency development; , effective leadership; , organisational performance.
Abstract
Purpose: Digital transformation in higher education demands improved performance from educational staff who are adaptable and professional. However, there remains a gap between the demands of digitalisation and the readiness of human resources, particularly in terms of competencies, leadership, and digital literacy. This study aims to analyse the influence of effective leadership, competency development, and digital literacy on the performance of educational staff, both directly and indirectly through job satisfaction, as well as to test the moderating role of digital literacy.
Research Design and Methodology: This study employs a quantitative approach using explanatory research methodology. The study population consists of educational staff at private higher education institutions in West Java Province, with a sample size of 100 respondents selected via purposive sampling. Data collection was conducted using a questionnaire with a Likert scale, and data analysis utilised Structural Equation Modelling based on Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). The research was conducted between January and March 2025.
Findings and Discussion: The results indicate that competency development, effective leadership, and digital literacy play a role in enhancing job satisfaction and the performance of educational staff. Job satisfaction was found to be a key mediating factor in the relationship between organisational variables and performance, whilst digital literacy acts as a moderating factor in this relationship. These findings indicate that improved performance is determined not only by technical factors but also by psychological aspects and the ability to adapt to technology.
Implications: The implications of this research emphasise the importance of digital-based competency development strategies, adaptive leadership, and the strengthening of digital literacy to enhance the performance of educational staff in a sustainable manner.
References
Aboramadan, M., Albashiti, B., Alharazin, H., & Zaidoune, S. (2020). Organizational culture, innovation and performance: A study from a non-western context. Journal of Management Development, 39(4), 437–451. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-06-2019-0253
Aboramadan, M., Dahleez, K., & Hamad, M. H. (2021). Servant leadership and academic outcomes in higher education: The role of job satisfaction. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(3), 562–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-11-2019-1923
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating e-learning systems success. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands–resources model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
Banks, G. C., McCauley, K. D., Gardner, W. L., & Guler, C. E. (2016). A meta-analytic review of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(4), 634–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.006
Bernarto, I., Bachtiar, D., Sudibjo, N., Suryawan, I. N., Purwanto, A., & Asbari, M. (2020). Transformational leadership and job satisfaction. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(3), 5495–5503.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
DeNisi, A. S., & Smith, C. E. (2014). Performance appraisal and firm-level performance. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 127–179. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.873178
Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley Computer Publishing.
Gılıç, F., Kanadlı, S., Gündüz, Y., & İnandı, Y. (2024). The mediating role of job satisfaction between leadership and performance. Educational Process, 13(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2024.132.4
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The Motivation to Work. John Wiley & Sons.
Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). A meta-analysis of leadership effectiveness. Journal of Management, 44(2), 501–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316665461
Inceoglu, I., Thomas, G., Chu, C., Plans, D., & Gerbasi, A. (2018). Leadership behaviour and well-being. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.006
Jang, M., Aavakare, M., Nikou, S., & Kim, S. (2021). Digital literacy and technology use. Telecommunications Policy, 45(7), 102154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102154
Johari, J., Shamsudin, F. M., Zainun, N. F. H., Yean, T. F., & Adnan, Z. (2022). Leadership competencies and job performance. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(6), 1027–1045. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2021-0280
Kabakus, A. K., Bahcekapili, E., & Ayaz, A. (2023). Digital literacy and technology acceptance. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(4), 1023–1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515231160028
Kallerhult Hermansson, S., van der Zijpp, T., Boman, E., Skytt, B., & Karlgren, K. (2024). Job satisfaction and competence. BMC Health Services Research, 24, 11177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11177-8
Katebi, A., HajiZadeh, M. H., Bordbar, A., & Salehi, A. M. (2022). Job satisfaction and performance. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 23(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-021-00280-y
Kleszewski, E., Otto, K., & Keller, A. C. (2023). Competence and well-being at work. Motivation and Emotion, 47, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-023-10029-y
Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C., Hildebrandt, V., van Buuren, S., van der Beek, A., & de Vet, H. (2014). Measuring work performance. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56(3), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000113
Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organisational psychology. Rand McNally.
Mardiana, H. (2024). Digital literacy and employee performance. SAGE Open, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241256937
Ng, W. (2012). Digital literacy in education. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2016). Method bias research. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
Sabuhari, R., Sudiro, A., Irawanto, D. W., & Rahayu, M. (2020). HR flexibility and performance. Management Science Letters, 10(8), 1775–1786. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.1.001
Salman, M., Ganie, S. A., & Saleem, I. (2020). Competency and performance. Management and Labour Studies, 45(4), 416–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X20939014
Schaufeli, W. B. (2017). Job demands-resources model application. Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.04.008
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business (7th ed.). Wiley.
Sugiyono. (2019). Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods. Alfabeta.
Suryadi, A. Q. M., & Setyono, L. (2024). Digital literacy and performance. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.1.207
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A., van Dijk, J., & de Haan, J. (2020). Digital skills and outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Farid Riadi, Dini Riani (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the full copyright of their published articles. By submitting and publishing their work, authors grant Vifada Management and Social Sciences the right of first publication. All published articles are simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original author(s) and the initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged.
